About Us Privacy Policy Contact Us Terms of Use

sphereinfos.com

HorseRacing

Turf Paradise Lockout: Sabotage or Legitimate Action?

The recent lockout at Turf Paradise has ignited a fierce dispute between the track's operator, Gary Hartunian, and owner, Jerry Simms. Hartunian alleges that Simms's actions constitute a deliberate act of sabotage, aiming to thwart the impending 2026-27 racing season. This contentious situation has left the horse racing community in a state of alarm, with many fearing the season's cancellation. Hartunian strongly refutes any claims of overdue lease payments, asserting that all financial obligations have been met. Furthermore, he contends that Simms is, in fact, indebted to him for over $3.2 million, citing undisclosed property damage and necessary repairs. The unfolding drama includes abrupt resignations of key management personnel and alleged interference with critical racetrack infrastructure, raising serious questions about the motives behind the lockout.

Details Unfold in Turf Paradise Lockout Controversy

On a fateful Saturday, the long-standing owner of Turf Paradise, Jerry Simms, initiated a lockout, effectively barring Gary Hartunian's management team from accessing the premises. Hartunian, who had been operating the track for nearly a year under a two-year lease agreement, swiftly countered on Monday, October 13, 2026, by publicly denouncing Simms's actions as a calculated act of "sabotage." This declaration came in a comprehensive 1,083-word statement issued by Mitchell Nelson, an attorney representing Hartunian's real estate firm, Landmark LA.

The lockout, which involved track security padlocking the doors of the Phoenix-based racetrack, has thrown the future of the upcoming racing season into disarray. While Hartunian has yet to confirm whether he will pursue legal action, the possibility of a court injunction against Simms was previously alluded to in a letter from Leroy Gessmann, executive director of the Arizona Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, to the HBPA board. Hartunian's legal team stated, "He is evaluating all available legal remedies to protect Skyfall 7’s contractual and operational rights, address the circumstances surrounding the lockout and obtain an independent accounting of any damage or interference affecting racetrack operations so that this can be resolved quickly before the upcoming meet."

Amidst the escalating tensions, a trainer, choosing to remain anonymous, voiced the pervasive anxiety within the community, stating, "Everybody is in panic. I think there is no chance they race" on the scheduled opening day of November 27. Simms has remained silent regarding his reasons for evicting Hartunian, offering "no comment" when contacted. However, Hartunian adamantly disputes any suggestions of financial delinquency, asserting that the minimal annual base rent stipulated in their lease agreement has been fully paid, along with all applicable property taxes.

Adding another layer of complexity, Hartunian claims that Simms owes him more than $3.2 million. This substantial sum, he argues, stems from "alleged undisclosed property damage, necessary repairs and municipal and state penalties and fines associated with conditions predating Skyfall 7’s operation of the facility." Hartunian reflected on their initial due diligence, noting that the rapid pace of licensing prevented a thorough assessment of the property's condition before the lease commenced. The weekend lockout not only impacted management but also extended to simulcast bettors, who were reportedly asked to vacate the premises as security personnel installed metal bars and locks on office entrances.

The situation further intensified with allegations of interference by information technology personnel during the lockout, who Hartunian and Nelson claim "interfered with critical networking, communications and simulcasting infrastructure" essential for the upcoming racing season. Furthermore, efforts were allegedly made to discourage a veterinarian from serving during the season, creating an additional operational hurdle. These events followed the abrupt resignation of general manager Tom Ludt on October 1, triggering a mass exodus of eight senior leaders from Hartunian's team, prompting him to swiftly secure a new management team by October 9. Despite these challenges, Hartunian remains steadfast in his commitment to the racing community, emphasizing the significant investments made in revitalizing Turf Paradise and expressing concern for the economic impact on local businesses and the future of horse racing in Arizona.

The unfolding drama at Turf Paradise highlights the precarious nature of business partnerships and the profound impact such disputes can have on an entire industry. From a broader perspective, this incident underscores the critical importance of transparent communication, comprehensive due diligence in contractual agreements, and robust contingency planning. The swift and decisive actions taken by both parties, particularly the lockout and subsequent legal threats, serve as a stark reminder that even well-established ventures can face unforeseen disruptions. The panic expressed by the racing community is a testament to the interconnectedness of various stakeholders—from trainers and owners to local businesses and fans—all of whom are directly affected by the stability and operation of such facilities. This situation also prompts reflection on the role of leadership in crisis management and the ethical obligations of property owners and operators to uphold their agreements, especially when a community's livelihood is at stake. The resolution of this conflict will undoubtedly set a precedent for future business dealings within the horse racing world, emphasizing the need for clear legal frameworks and a commitment to protecting the integrity of the sport.

Back to Top